Proxy Re Encryption Key Generation
Proxy Re Encryption Key Generation 4,7/5 1160 reviews
  1. Proxy Re Encryption Key Generation Download
  2. Encryption Software
  3. Public Key Encryption

Proxy re-encryption (PRE) schemes are cryptosystems which allow third parties (proxies) to alter a ciphertext which has been encrypted for one party, so that it may be decrypted by another.

Proxy re-encryption allows a proxy to transform a ciphertext computed under Alice’s public key into one that can be opened by Bob’s secret key. There are many useful applications of this primitive.

Examples of use[edit]

A proxy re-encryption is generally used when one party, say Bob, wants to reveal the contents of messages sent to him and encrypted with his public key to a third party, Charlie, without revealing his private key to Charlie. Bob does not want the proxy to be able to read the contents of his messages.[1] Bob could designate a proxy to re-encrypt one of his messages that is to be sent to Charlie. This generates a new key that Charlie can use to decrypt the message. Now if Bob sends Charlie a message that was encrypted under Bob's key, the proxy will alter the message, allowing Charlie to decrypt it. Windows 7 product key generator 2014 home premium 64 bit. This method allows for a number of applications such as e-mail forwarding, law-enforcement monitoring, and content distribution.

A weaker re-encryption scheme is one in which the proxy possesses both parties' keys simultaneously. One key decrypts a plaintext, while the other encrypts it. Since the goal of many proxy re-encryption schemes is to avoid revealing either of the keys or the underlying plaintext to the proxy, this method is not ideal.

Defining functions[edit]

Proxy re-encryption schemes are similar to traditional symmetric or asymmetric encryption schemes, with the addition of two functions:

  • Delegation – allows a message recipient (keyholder) to generate a re-encryption key based on his secret key and the key of the delegated user. This re-encryption key is used by the proxy as input to the re-encryption function, which is executed by the proxy to translate ciphertexts to the delegated user's key. Asymmetric proxy re-encryption schemes come in bi-directional and uni-directional varieties.
    • In a bi-directional scheme, the re-encryption scheme is reversible—that is, the re-encryption key can be used to translate messages from Bob to Charlie, as well as from Charlie to Bob. This can have various security consequences, depending on the application. One notable characteristic of bi-directional schemes is that both the delegator and delegated party (e.g., Charlie and Bob) must combine their secret keys to produce the re-encryption key.
    • A uni-directional scheme is effectively one-way; messages can be re-encrypted from Bob to Charlie, but not the reverse. Uni-directional schemes can be constructed such that the delegated party need not reveal its secret key. For example, Bob could delegate to Charlie by combining his secret key with Charlie's public key.
  • Transitivity – Transitive proxy re-encryption schemes allow for a ciphertext to be re-encrypted an unlimited number of times. For example, a ciphertext might be re-encrypted from Bob to Charlie, and then again from Charlie to David and so on. Non-transitive schemes allow for only one (or a limited number) of re-encryptions on a given ciphertext. Currently, the only known uni-directional, transitive proxy re-encryption is done through the use of Homomorphic Encryption[2].
  • Cloud Computing – Proxy re-encryption has potential applications for secure sharing in a cloud computing environment. In the cloud scenario the re-encryption key is provided to the cloud operator/admin. Looking at the Bob, Charlie, David example, the cloud would take the place of Charlie. Bob generates a re-encryption key to supply to the cloud. The cloud operator/admin completes a re-encrypt of Bob’s encrypted files into David’s files whenever David downloads Bob’s files. Challenges exist with the cloud solution. A user could conspire with a cloud operator to gain access to all a user’s, such as Bob, files. A second potential challenge is segmentation via access control. A cloud user can restrict access to files via the assignment of conditional values. However, the number of re-encryption keys grows proportionately with the number of conditional values. This situation is not optimal for resource constrained devices.[3]
Where to find encryption keyGeneration

Proxy re-encryption should not be confused with proxy signatures, which is a separate construction with a different purpose.

Proxy Re Encryption Key Generation Download

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^Nabeel's Blog, Seen Nov 2014, http://mohamednabeel.blogspot.ca/2011/03/proxy-re-encryption.html
  2. ^Gentry, Craig (September 2009). A Fully Homomorphic Encryption System(PDF). p. 35.
  3. ^W. Chen, C. Fan, Y. Tseng (10–13 December 2018). 'Efficient Key-Aggregate Proxy Re-Encryption for Secure Data Sharing in Clouds'. 2018 IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing (DSC): 1–4. doi:10.1109/DESEC.2018.8625149. ISBN978-1-5386-5790-4.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: date format (link)

Encryption Software

  • M. Blaze, G. Bleumer, M. Strauss. Divertible Protocols and Atomic Proxy Cryptography.
  • Bertino, E., Sandhu, R. 'Database security - concepts, approaches, and challenges.'IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2 (2005): 2-19
  • G. Ateniese, K. Fu, M. Green, S. Hohenberger. Improved Proxy Re-encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS 2005), San Diego, California, 2005.
  • M. Green, G. Ateniese. Identity-Based Proxy Re-encryption. Applied Cryptography and Network Security Conference, June 2007.
  • S. Hohenberger, G. Rothblum, a. shelat, and V. Vaikuntanathan. Securely Obfuscating Re-encryption. Proceedings of the Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC), 2007.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Proxy_re-encryption&oldid=943575319'

Public Key Encryption

  1. Ateniese, G., Fu, K., Green, M., Hohenberger, S.: Improved Proxy Re-encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 9(1), 1–30 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Beimel, A.: Secure schemes for secret sharing and key distribution. PhD Thesis, Israel Institute of Technology, Technion, Haifa (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Bethencourt, J., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 321–334 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. Blaze, M., Bleumer, G., Strauss, M.J.: Divertible Protocols and Atomic Proxy Cryptography. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1403, pp. 127–144. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boneh, D., Hamburg, M.: Generalized identity based and broadcast encryption schemes. In: Pieprzyk, J. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5350, pp. 455–470. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boneh, D., Waters, B.: Conjunctive, subset, and range queries on encrypted data. In: Vadhan, S.P. (ed.) TCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4392, pp. 535–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canetti, R., Halevi, S., Katz, J.: Chosen-ciphertext security from identity-based encryption. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 207–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canetti, R., Hohenberger, S.: Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-encryption. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security - ACM CCS 2007, pp. 185–194 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Chow, S.S.M., Weng, J., Yang, Y., Deng, R.H.: Efficient Unidirectional Proxy Re-Encryption. In: Bernstein, D.J., Lange, T. (eds.) AFRICACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6055, pp. 316–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emura, K., Miyaji, A., Omote, K.: An Identity-Based Proxy Re-Encryption Scheme with Source Hiding Property, and its Application to a Mailing-List System. In: Camenisch, J., Lambrinoudakis, C. (eds.) EuroPKI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6711, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security - ACM CCS 2006, pp. 89–98 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. Green, M., Ateniese, G.: Identity-Based Proxy Re-encryption. In: Katz, J., Yung, M. (eds.) ACNS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4521, pp. 288–306. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lai, J., Deng, R.H., Yang, Y., Weng, J.: Adaptable Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption. In: Cao, Z., Zhang, F. (eds.) Pairing 2013. LNCS, vol. 8365, pp. 199–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kawai, Y., Takashima, K.: Fully-Anonymous Functional Proxy-Re-Encryption. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, pp. 318, 201Google Scholar
  15. Liang, K., Fang, L., Wong, D.S., Susilo, W.: A ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption with chosen-ciphertext security. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2013, 236 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. Liang, X., Cao, Z., Lin, H., Shao, J.: Attribute based proxy re-encryption with delegating capabilities. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information, Computer, and Communications Security, ASIACCS 2009, pp. 276–286. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Libert, B., Vergnaud, D.: Unidirectional Chosen-Ciphertext Secure Proxy Re-encryption. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) PKC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4939, pp. 360–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luo, S., Hu, J., Chen, Z.: Ciphertext Policy Attribute-Based Proxy Re-encryption. In: Soriano, M., Qing, S., López, J. (eds.) ICICS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6476, pp. 401–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsuo, T.: Proxy re-encryption systems for identity-based encryption. In: Takagi, T., Okamoto, T., Okamoto, E., Okamoto, T. (eds.) Pairing 2007. LNCS, vol. 4575, pp. 247–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73489-5_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mizuno, T., Doi, H.: Hybrid proxy re-encryption scheme for attribute-based encryption. In: Bao, F., Yung, M., Lin, D., Jing, J. (eds.) Inscrypt 2009. LNCS, vol. 6151, pp. 288–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ostrovsky, R., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Attribute-based encryption with non-monotonic access structures. In: ACM CCS 2007, pp. 195–203 (2007)Google Scholar
  22. Pirretti, M., Traynor, P., McDaniel, P., Waters, B.: Secure attribute-based systems. In: ACM CCS 2006, pp. 99–112 (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Fuzzy identity-based encryption. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 457–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Arita, S.: Flexible Attribute-Based Encryption. In: Chim, T.W., Yuen, T.H. (eds.) ICICS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7618, pp. 471–478. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shao, J., Cao, Z.: CCA-Secure Proxy Re-encryption without Pairings. In: Jarecki, S., Tsudik, G. (eds.) PKC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5443, pp. 357–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shi, E., Waters, B.: Delegating capabilities in predicate encryption systems. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5126, pp. 560–578. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Waters, B.: Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption: An expressive, efficient, and provably secure realization. In: Catalano, D., Fazio, N., Gennaro, R., Nicolosi, A. (eds.) PKC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6571, pp. 53–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
⇐ ⇐ Generating Public Private Rsa Key Pair Online
⇒ ⇒ Freemake Video Converter Gold Pack Key Generator